Cic edizioni internazionali
Il Giornale di Chirurgia

Validation of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram to detect non-sentinel lymph node metastases in a United Kingdom cohort

Original Article, 12 - 19
doi: 11138/gchir/2018.39.1.012
Tag this article
Abstract
Enhanced HTML Full text PDF
Aim. Axillary lymph node dissection, although associated with long-term morbidity, has been the standard of treatment for all nodepositive breast cancer patients. We assessed the risk prediction ability (validity) of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram for non-sentinel lymph node metastases and analysed the outcome of patients with sentinel node metastases.
Patients and methods. All operable early breast cancer patients with sentinel node macro metastases (size > 2mm) who underwent axillary dissection from April 2009 to March 2015 were considered eligible. The risk of non-sentinel lymph node metastases was calculated using an online MSKCC calculator, and accuracy was determined based on the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). Tumour characteristics and overall survival were also analysed as secondary end points.
Results. Of 1745 patients who were diagnosed with operable breast cancer during the study period, 114 patients were considered eligible. The AUC-ROC was 0.66 suggestive of lesser accuracy in prediction and not statistically significant (p value = 0.7303). Seventysix (50.7%) of these patients did not have any non-sentinel node metastases.
At a mean follow up of four years, the disease-free survival was 86.4% and overall survival rate was 88.4%.
Conclusions. The MSKCC nomogram was unable to accurately predict the risk in our cohort of patients with more than half of this cohort of patients not requiring axillary dissection. These findings are consistent with other European studies. This study thus highlights the need for modified prediction model for European cohorts.

Vol. XXXIX (No. 4) 2018 July-August

  1. Colovesical fistula: review on conservative management, surgical techniques and minimally invasive approaches
    Cochetti G., Del Zingaro M., Boni A., Cocca D., Panciarola M., Tiezzi A., Gaudio G., Balzarini F., Ursi P., Mearini E.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.195
  2. A new modified Mayo technique: should the surgeons need a new open technique for hernia repair in their armamentarium?
    Toro A., Stella G., Gueli A., Mannino M., Teodoro M., Schembari E., Palermo F., Di Carlo I.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.195
  3. The effect of peritoneal dialysis with alkaline dialysate in peritonitis carcinomatosis: an experimental study in mice
    Zumrutdal E., Tolga Sahin T., Kulahci Ö., Bilecik T., Temiz Ö., Cetinkunar S., Turut N., Daglioglu K., Canbolat Y., Akbulut S.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.215
  4. Preliminary results about a novel technique of mesh positioning in the abdominal wall hernia repair
    Licari L., Salamone G., Campanella S., Sabatino C., Ciolino G, Parinisi Z., Carfì F., De Marco P., Gulotta G.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.223
  5. Peribulbar anesthesia in sclero-retinal surgery: two quadrants vs single injection
    Malagola R., Collini S., Trosi F., Giannotti R., Arrico L.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.227
  6. Early versus delayed approach in cholecystectomy after admission to an emergency department. A multicenter retrospective study
    Vaccari S., Lauro A., Cervellera M., Casella G., D'Andrea V., Di Matteo F.M., Santoro A., Panarese A., Gulotta E., Cirocchi R., Ussia A., Brighi M., Romano A., Tonini V.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.232
  7. Densitometric changes of the patella in patients undergoing unilateral knee arthroplasty
    Izzo S., Izzo L., Di Cello P., Sinaimeri G., De Santis A., Razionale F., Costi U., Gabriele R., Valabrega S., Pugliese F., Izzo P.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.239
  8. Surgical management of complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia in a woman with rare genitourinary anomalies: unicornuate uterus with rudimentary horn, ipsilateral ectopic ovary and pelvic kidney
    Grigoriadis C., Tympa A., Terzakis E., Theodoraki K., Hassiakos D.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.245
  9. Sporadic pedunculated duodenal adenomas. Clinical presentations and endoscopic management: a case series
    Bruno G., Trentino P., Viarengo M.A., Toma A., Virili C., Centanni M., Picarelli A., Gozzo P., Accarpio F., Porowska B.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.248
  10. Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: case report and literature review
    Antonelli M.S., Mallel G., Pecoraro A., Vitale V., Maggi S., Lombardi A., Stanzani G., Amanti C.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.255
  11. Transrectal ultrasonography of perianal fistulas: a single center experience from a surgeon’s point of view
    Karanikas I., Koutserimpas C., Siaperas P., Skarpas A., Karoubalis J., Velimezis G.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.258
Last Viewed articles: la lista degli ultimi x visitati.
  1. Validation of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram to detect non-sentinel lymph node metastases in a United Kingdom cohort
    Syed A., Eleti S., Kumar V., Ahmad A., Thomas H.
    doi: 11138/gchir/2018.39.1.012
credits