Cic edizioni internazionali
Il Giornale di Chirurgia

Role of specimen US for predicting resection margin status in breast conserving therapy

Original Article, 201 - 204
doi: 10.11138/gchir/2015.36.5.201
Tag this article
Abstract
Enhanced HTML Full text PDF
Aim. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of specimen ultrasound (US) for predicting resection margin status in women undergoing breast conserving therapy for US-detected cancer, having the histological findings as the reference standard.
Patients and methods. A total of 132 consecutive patients (age range, 34-87 years; mean, 51 years) underwent breast-conserving surgery for US-detected invasive breast cancer. All surgical specimens underwent US examination. The presence of lesion within the specimen and its distance from the specimen margins were assessed considering a threshold distance between the lesion and specimen margins of 10 mm. US findings were then compared with the pathological ones and specimen US. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) for predicting histological margin status were evaluated, having the histological findings as the reference standard.
Results. The histological examination detected invasive ductal carcinoma in 96/132 (73%) cases, invasive lobular carcinoma in 32/132 (24%), mucinous carcinoma in 4/132 (3%). The pathological margin analysis revealed 96/132 (73%) negative margins and 36 (27%) close/positive margins. US examination detected all 132 breast lesions within the surgical specimens. 110 (83%) negative margins and 22 (17%) positive margins were found on US. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, PPV and NPV of 44%, 94%, 80%, 73% and 82%, respectively, were found for specimen US.
Conclusions. Specimen US represents a time and cost saving imaging tool for evaluating the presence of US detected-breast lesion within surgical specimen and for predicting the histological margin status.

Vol. XXXIX (No. 4) 2018 July-August

  1. Colovesical fistula: review on conservative management, surgical techniques and minimally invasive approaches
    Cochetti G., Del Zingaro M., Boni A., Cocca D., Panciarola M., Tiezzi A., Gaudio G., Balzarini F., Ursi P., Mearini E.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.195
  2. A new modified Mayo technique: should the surgeons need a new open technique for hernia repair in their armamentarium?
    Toro A., Stella G., Gueli A., Mannino M., Teodoro M., Schembari E., Palermo F., Di Carlo I.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.195
  3. The effect of peritoneal dialysis with alkaline dialysate in peritonitis carcinomatosis: an experimental study in mice
    Zumrutdal E., Tolga Sahin T., Kulahci Ö., Bilecik T., Temiz Ö., Cetinkunar S., Turut N., Daglioglu K., Canbolat Y., Akbulut S.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.215
  4. Preliminary results about a novel technique of mesh positioning in the abdominal wall hernia repair
    Licari L., Salamone G., Campanella S., Sabatino C., Ciolino G, Parinisi Z., Carfì F., De Marco P., Gulotta G.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.223
  5. Peribulbar anesthesia in sclero-retinal surgery: two quadrants vs single injection
    Malagola R., Collini S., Trosi F., Giannotti R., Arrico L.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.227
  6. Early versus delayed approach in cholecystectomy after admission to an emergency department. A multicenter retrospective study
    Vaccari S., Lauro A., Cervellera M., Casella G., D'Andrea V., Di Matteo F.M., Santoro A., Panarese A., Gulotta E., Cirocchi R., Ussia A., Brighi M., Romano A., Tonini V.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.232
  7. Densitometric changes of the patella in patients undergoing unilateral knee arthroplasty
    Izzo S., Izzo L., Di Cello P., Sinaimeri G., De Santis A., Razionale F., Costi U., Gabriele R., Valabrega S., Pugliese F., Izzo P.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.239
  8. Surgical management of complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia in a woman with rare genitourinary anomalies: unicornuate uterus with rudimentary horn, ipsilateral ectopic ovary and pelvic kidney
    Grigoriadis C., Tympa A., Terzakis E., Theodoraki K., Hassiakos D.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.245
  9. Sporadic pedunculated duodenal adenomas. Clinical presentations and endoscopic management: a case series
    Bruno G., Trentino P., Viarengo M.A., Toma A., Virili C., Centanni M., Picarelli A., Gozzo P., Accarpio F., Porowska B.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.248
  10. Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: case report and literature review
    Antonelli M.S., Mallel G., Pecoraro A., Vitale V., Maggi S., Lombardi A., Stanzani G., Amanti C.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.255
  11. Transrectal ultrasonography of perianal fistulas: a single center experience from a surgeon’s point of view
    Karanikas I., Koutserimpas C., Siaperas P., Skarpas A., Karoubalis J., Velimezis G.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2018.39.4.258
Last Viewed articles: la lista degli ultimi x visitati.
  1. Role of specimen US for predicting resection margin status in breast conserving therapy
    Moschetta M., Telegrafo M., Introna T., Coi L., Rella L., Ranieri V., Cirilli A., Stabile Ianora A.A., Angelelli G.
    doi: 10.11138/gchir/2015.36.5.201
credits